Archived polls

Archived polls

What is the biggest omission from the agenda for Rio?
A main session on the development agenda in Internet governance
Open roundtable sessions such as speed dialogues
A main session on the role and mandate of the IGF
An online collaboration platform for remote participants
A main session on global Internet governance institutions

Is the IGF fulfilling its mandate?
No
Yes

Why have IGF main sessions become so boring?
Organisers are excluding controversial issues.
Stakeholders with other views don't participate.
They haven't.
We have overcome some of our differences.
Fear of rocking the boat before IGF is renewed.
Sessions are only being used for positive PR.

Who will dominate the IGF?

Governments
  35% (7)

Private Sector
  10% (2)

Civil Society
  15% (3)

Intergovernmental organisations
  5% (1)

Nobody: multistakeholderism will work
  35% (7)

Total Votes: 20
What is the most important reform for the IGF?
Secretariat and advisory group more transparent
Establishment of working groups
Multi-stakeholder appointment of advisory group
Bottom-up agenda setting
Better provision for remote participation
Funding for disadvantaged groups to attend

 
© 2014 Jeremy Malcolm and contributors. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence. Powered by WebGUI.